Skip to main content

Use Critical Damage to make your critters memorable

Earlier today, I answered a similar, Into the Odd related question asked on both G+ and /r/osr. The question was, basically, how to go about converting old school, B/X style creatures to ItO. My answer echoed earlier advice I'd heard from Chris McDowall -- don't sweat the numbers. Make your creatures interesting in other ways.

This got me thinking about one of the things I really like in ItO that I don't exploit enough -- unique consequences for Critical Damage. Usually, Critical Damage (a failed save after taking damage to your Strength) knocks you unconscious until your allies can assist you. However, some of the example creatures in ItO have special consequences if you take Critical Damage against them. One creature might swallow you whole. Another might crawl down your throat and lay eggs.

This is a really powerful way to make a creature memorable. And requires little thinking over math, mechanics, or balance. The player has already failed their Saving Throw. Now the question is just, "How bad is it?" The game is almost whispering in the referee's ear: "It's okay now. Go ahead. Make it bad. Make it hurt. Make them remember this creature."

As an example of how I wish I'd been exploiting this more, let's tackle an old-school problem: Making our kobolds, goblins, orcs, and hobgoblins feel distinct from each other.

Let's give them the exact same stats: 

3 HP, 10 STR, 10 DEX, 10 WIL, 0 armor, d6 attack

The most generic of Into the Odd stats. We could spend time tweaking these for each creature. But is a 2 HP, 9 STR, 12 DEX, 9 WIL Goblin really going to seem any different to the players than a 3 HP, 12 STR, 10 DEX, 11 WIL Orc? If we instead give them each a unique Critical Damage effect:


On Critical Damage, the kobold places a lit stick of dynamite under the character's unconscious body.


On Critical Damage, the goblin begins eating the unconscious character's fingers. Each round, they eat another finger unless attacked.


On Critical Damage, the orc steals a random possession from the unconscious character and flees.


On Critical Damage, the hobgoblin picks up the character's unconscious body and flees with it.

Just that one little thing -- the consequence players will face if they fail -- makes these most generic of enemies suddenly feel distinct from each other. The players are definitely going to remember that Goblins are the ones that eat their fingers vs. Orcs are the ones who make hit-and-run raids on their equipment. And they're probably going to be worried fighting either, regardless of how average the stats actually are.

And that's it. No math, no new mechanics, no crazy complicated powers, as much time thinking about it as it took to type this. Why haven't I been doing this way more?


If you're curious, the answer I gave to the "How to convert old school, B/X creatures to Into the Odd" questions was:

General advice for ability scores, don't sweat the numbers too much. Your players really won't notice. Just keep STR, DEX, WIL at the default 10 unless a creature feels especially strong, weak, fast, cowardly, etc. And, in those cases, use the extremes of the scale. i.e. If you wouldn't change the ability to at least a 5 or 15, don't bother changing it at all.

Specific to B/X, I tend to use Morale as a rough gauge for what the creature's Into the Odd WIL should be. For enemies, WIL mostly gets used for morale saves anyway. Exceptionally cowardly or brave B/X morale? 3~5 or 15~18 WIL in ItO.

STR and DEX are usually easier to decide. Strong, fast, slow, etc. If you really need defined numbers, just borrow the equivalent creature ability scores from the 5E SRD.

The creature's attacks, special abilities, and consequences of critical damage are much more important than the numbers. The "Don't Make Soft Monsters" section here is great advice on how to make creatures feel unique and dangerous via their attacks:


Popular posts from this blog

"The Gardens of Ynn" Referee Control Panels

I recently picked up Emmy Allen's excellent The Gardens of Ynn, and I think this will be the next adventure I run. I still have an itch for Alice in Wonderland -esque adventure, and this seems like it will scratch that nicely.

(Side note: Rather than diving into another long, continuous campaign, I think I'm going to run a series of shorter adventures connected only by players keeping the same characters between them. Embrace the picaresque. Work through my collection of great OSR adventures.)

One of the things about running Ynn that looks like it will be a challenge is the amount of random rolling that needs to be done. Everything is procedurally generated (which I love!). At a minimum, you need to roll for Location, Detail, and Event as the players move to each new location. And it's not just the rolling, there is also the time spent flipping through pages to read the result of each roll. After doing that, I think I'd be unlikely to use other information from the back …

A Simple Resource Management System for Into the Odd

Rules without the commentary available here.

My mind is still on resource management systems. 

Into the Odd (ItO) doesn't have one and, to be honest, doesn't need one. Plenty of tension to be found via description rather than tracking individual rations. ItO is lightweight, fast, and runs great if you simply assume that, as written, the expedition always has food, water, light, camping & climbing equipment. 

So why bother with managing resources? 
Character customizationLike with Ben Milton's new Knave (, I like the idea of a character's role being determined by what kind of equipment they are carrying. Want to be a "fighter" in a classless system like ItO? Carry large, powerful weapons and wear armor. Want to be a "magic user"? Carry lots of Arcana (or spellbooks). A "specialist" (to use the LotFP term)? Carry lots of tools, poison vials, flashbangs, etc.

But customization like this works best if there is a l…

No good words

I believe Mandy. I believe Jennifer. I believe Hannah.
I believe Vivka.
The manipulation, abuse, and pain they describe are unacceptable to me. I informed my players that our current campaign is immediately at an end. There was unanimous agreement.
May Mandy, Jennifer, Hannah, Vivka and any other victims be surrounded by genuine kindness, friendship, and love.
This blog is no longer a thing I am proud of. Too much of it reads as an endorsement of a person who deserved none. I plan to delete all of that content. Not to hide my shame at not realizing sooner, but so that no positive word about Zak S remains to influence anyone.